@mwlucas this was especially egregious. It was really self evident!
@mwlucas ugh. Edition. I feel dumb now!
@mwlucas dnssec 2e? Ao3e?
@lattera What happens when they start the ultimate phase of their plan where they mix the DoH https servers with the cloudflare frontend proxies? Just block all of cloudflare? (Not that I am opposed to this, it would just be highly disruptive)
@lattera I don't think that many NEW ones will.. I cannot tell you the number of times I have entered a hostname on the "url" bar and been taken to a google search for that hostname because I didn't trip whatever algorithm to recognize it as hostname vs wanting to search.
(PS: I hate the combined search/url bar)
@bcallah my guess is. 0
@lattera 😂. Only 25g though. That isn’t too bad!
@phryk Yeah, it is very poor they still called it '12.0' .. either they should call it just '12', or they should have '12.0', '12.1', etc (especially with this breaking.. whatever it is)
Link: https://www.freebsd.org/releases/12.1R/errata.html#open-issues
@phryk single user mode from loader will bypass all of rc.conf
@phryk i had that happen when I used 12.0 compiled drm modules on a 12.1 kernel (and is now acknowledged in the 12.1 errata). (Well. The reboot. Not the rc.conf bit)
@florian oops. Now I found it
@florian what is the latest one?
FreeBSD enthusiast and regular contributor. I have opinions!